Georgia high income child support deviation

//Georgia high income child support deviation

Georgia high income child support deviation

With the increasing publicity related to celebrities and their custody disputes (Usher, T.O., Mindy McCready and other artists we have posted about), an interesting question arises as to how judges in Georgia handle child support obligations when one parent makes a significantly higher income than the other parent. The purpose of child support is to provide the minor child with a lifestyle that reflects the income of both parents. What do you do when one parent makes ten times, twenty times, or even one hundred times more?

I recently attended a seminar where a panel of judges discussed this issue. A Gwinnett County judge indicated that lump sum child support might be appropriate. Lump sum child support is usually one large payment that, once paid, would completely resolve the parent’s obligation to pay child support in the future. The benefit to lump sum child support would be ensuring that the entire child support obligation until the minor child turns eighteen would have already been paid even if the high-income parent were to lose his or her job later. However, if the high income earning parent were to lose his or her job later, an argument could be made that the lump sum child support was inappropriate because that parent would have had to pay a lower child support payment if his or her income were lower.

A Cobb County judge suggested that another way to determine child support in high-income cases is to use percentages. By way of example, if the child support payment should be 15% of the parent’s net income, then it should not matter whether the 15% is applied to an income of $40,000.00 or $400,000.00 or $4,000,000.00. A Fulton County judge stated that her main concern in such cases is that the money is put to good use and be used for the minor child rather than going to the living expenses of the other parent. This Fulton County judge stated that, depending on the case, it maybe in the best interest of the child to require that a certain sum be set for the minor child and defer accessibility to that fund so the custodial parent does not waste it. Another judge stated,however, that just because one parent earns a significantly higher income than the other does not mean that the child support obligation should be significantly higher as well. This judge wanted to prevent the situation where the custodial parent was essentially “winning the lottery” through child support and stated that a downward deviation is appropriate.

By |2016-06-24T15:53:05+00:00June 24th, 2016|Informative|7 Comments

About the Author:

Emily is a passionate Family Law attorney who has dedicated her practice to representing clients and families going through Family Law matters. Emotions run high in most family law cases and she strives to provide her clients with both thoughtful and realistic strategy and short term and long term goals. Read More


  1. legit February 18, 2017 at 3:39 pm

    It’s genuinely very complicated in this full of activity life to listen news on TV, so
    I just use web for that reason, and get the most recent news.

  2. BHW March 27, 2017 at 9:11 pm

    Hello to all, the contents present at this web page are really amazing
    for people experience, well, keep up the nice work fellows.

  3. BHW April 9, 2017 at 8:51 am

    I enjoy looking through an article that will make people think.
    Also, thank you for allowing me to comment!

  4. July 4, 2017 at 1:49 pm

    I like the article

  5. July 6, 2017 at 5:30 pm

    Thanks for the wonderful article

  6. July 14, 2017 at 2:13 pm

    I enjoy the article

  7. Calistaheritage.Org July 23, 2017 at 10:04 pm

    It works very well for me

Leave A Comment